[Cake] cake vs fqcodel with 1 client, 4 servers

[George Amanakis]

4servers  --   delay   --   isp   --   mbox   --   1client
netserver     10/10ms     10/2mbit    9/1.8mbit    flent

net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=2
11down/2upstream flows using 4 parallel rrul_be_nflows

cobalt branch
cake params: rtt 20ms triple-isolate ack-filter

cake_4mtu --> r402 with ingress
cake_noadjust --> r400 with ingress
cake_noing --> r400 without ingress



On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 04:27 +0200, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> The latest push now enforces 4 x MTU x flows on the target intra-flow 
> latency.  When lightly loaded, the normal target still applies.
> This gives a noticeable improvement on the goodput of World of
> Warships' updater, which does its level best to stuff 150 HTTP flows
> through my 512Kbps downlink, while retaining reasonable inter-flow
> latency as measured by using other applications and/or hosts.
> I'd like to see a more controlled test of this, to compare with the
> previous behaviour.
> - Jonathan Morton
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: rrulbe_11_4_4servers_1client_10mbit_2mbit_cake_ingress.tgz
Type: application/x-compressed-tar
Size: 1927267 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20171206/cf09dce8/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: boxcombine_cake_ingress.png.png
Type: image/png
Size: 104088 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20171206/cf09dce8/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: boxtotals_cake_ingress.png
Type: image/png
Size: 133037 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20171206/cf09dce8/attachment-0003.png>