[Cake] total download rate with many flows
dave.taht at gmail.com
Tue Nov 14 17:23:36 EST 2017
because cobalt is more aggressive than codel. I've never believed in it.
I'm sitting here trying to figure out how to get good ole regular cake
to compile again.
I just merged the new ack stuff into the codel branch.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM, G. Amanakis via Cake
<cake at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> Cake mailing list
> Cake at lists.bufferbloat.net
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "G. Amanakis" <g_amanakis at yahoo.com>
> To: Dave Taht <dave at taht.net>, George Amanakis via Cake <cake at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:13:16 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Cake] total download rate with many flows
> Yes, it is. I am building from the cobalt branch. What makes you believe otherwise? Would you expect a different behaviour?
> On November 14, 2017 3:11:04 PM EST, Dave Taht <dave at taht.net> wrote:
>> George Amanakis via Cake <cake at lists.bufferbloat.net> writes:
>>> From: George Amanakis <g_amanakis at yahoo.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Cake] total download rate with many flows
>>> To: David Lang <david at lang.hm>
>>> Cc: cake at lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:49:53 -0500 (17 hours, 20 minutes, 42 seconds ago)
>>> Dear David,
>>> I agree. My point is that currently ingress mode seems to be dropping more
>>> packets than necessary to keep senders from bottlenecking the connection (when
>>> there is a large number of concurrent flows, >8). And right now, ingress mode is
>>> the only mode that achieves this in situations such as Windows updates.
>> Is cobalt enabled in your build?
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
More information about the Cake