[Cake] Cake upstream Planning
Pete Heist
peteheist at gmail.com
Wed Nov 15 15:58:32 EST 2017
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Nils Andreas Svee <nils at stokkdalen.no> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017, at 21:19, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>>> There’s also been a Cake support feature request hanging around in the EdgeOS
>>> forums for a while after Lochnair’s successful work to get it built for the
>>> EdgeRouter firmware:
>>>
>>> https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/Cake-shaper-support/idi-p/1885749
>>
>> I had viewed those folk as a key path to commercialization. They have
>> a great user community and great products.
>>
>>> Maybe this would help get it pushed through into a device that I think has
>>> pretty wide deployment…
>>
>> The problem is, they were stuck on kernel 3.10, when last I looked and
>> oy...
>>
>> I keep hoping we can get cavium to pay attention directly.
> Sadly they're still stuck 3.10. The next FW will be based on the
> 3.10.107 kernel, instead of 3.10.14/3.10.20. So that's something, but
> it's still ancient and EOL.
Is the tie to 3.10 due to the dependency on the Cavium SDK for hardware support?
Surprisingly I don’t see a feature request so far for a newer kernel, at least among the first half dozen pages or so:
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/idb-p/EdgeMAX_Ideas/tab/most-kudoed <https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/idb-p/EdgeMAX_Ideas/tab/most-kudoed>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20171115/f99bbdbd/attachment.html>
More information about the Cake
mailing list