[Cake] CAKE upstreaming - testers wanted, ACK filtering rescuers needed

Jonas Mårtensson martensson.jonas at gmail.com
Thu Apr 26 08:02:13 EDT 2018


I thought the discussion was only about GSO/TSO. Also, isn't GRO/LRO
incompatible with routing? Anyway, I was just supporting your
interpretation of what Eric potentially means.

/Jonas

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk>
wrote:

> Jonas Mårtensson <martensson.jonas at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > "I *think* that what Eric means is that the GSO logic should
> automatically
> > size the GSO superpackets so the latency cost is negligible for the
> actual
> > link rate."
> >
> > Something like this?
> >
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/564979/
> >
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/564978/
>
> Yeah, that's for TCP on the local host. I'm not sure how things work for
> GRO on a router (which is more relevant for the CAKE use case).
>
> -Toke
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20180426/e1eb7844/attachment.html>


More information about the Cake mailing list