[Cake] a couple quick test runs of the v17+1 patchset
Dave Taht
dave.taht at gmail.com
Wed May 30 16:39:44 EDT 2018
The paper makes the claim that we can shape to .1% of the bandwidth
and win. Well, at gigE rates, it's closer to .2%, as setting the
shaper to 980mbit got consistently sub 2.2ms RTT latency on the rrul
test, higher usually cracked 5 or 6, while bandwidth went from 934 to
936. So we can take a .2%-ish bandwidth hit in exchange for reducing
the max latency by 2/3s on this particular test series.
And this of course ignores the impact of flow control, my environment,
academic rigor, etc, etc. And I shudder to go measure the cpu
overhead.
And it didn't crash, and perhaps I'll go play with cake with veth
simulating > gigE bandwidths.
Only question is: why is the capacity estimate 970mbit?
root at spaceheater:~/git/linux/tc-adv/tc# ./tc -s qdisc show dev enp6s0
qdisc cake 8017: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 980Mbit diffserv3
triple-isolate split-gso rtt 100.0ms raw overhead 0
Sent 23871634960 bytes 17506050 pkt (dropped 2, overlimits 30089616 requeues 7)
backlog 370996b 246p requeues 7
memory used: 1053008b of 15140Kb
capacity estimate: 970Mbit
min/max network layer size: 42 / 1514
min/max overhead-adjusted size: 42 / 1514
average network hdr offset: 14
Bulk Best Effort Voice
thresh 61250Kbit 980Mbit 245Mbit
target 5.0ms 5.0ms 5.0ms
interval 100.0ms 100.0ms 100.0ms
pk_delay 4.1ms 3.2ms 4.2ms
av_delay 2.3ms 2.4ms 3.1ms
sp_delay 231us 642us 321us
backlog 27318b 263436b 80242b
pkts 1476388 11611873 4418037
bytes 1497338404 16405801643 5968868937
way_inds 0 8 0
way_miss 12 209 15
way_cols 0 0 0
drops 2 0 0
marks 0 0 0
ack_drop 0 0 0
sp_flows 2 4 3
bk_flows 1 2 1
un_flows 0 0 0
max_len 68130 68130 68130
quantum 1514 1514 1514
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
More information about the Cake
mailing list