toke at toke.dk
Wed Sep 19 05:11:36 EDT 2018
Ruben <ruben at vfn-nrw.de> writes:
> Hey Toke,
> Am 13.09.2018 21:12 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk>:
> Ruben <ruben at vfn-nrw.de> writes:
> > Hey Toke,
> > Thanks for your fast response!
> > Am 13.09.2018 12:27 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk>:
> > Ruben <ruben at vfn-nrw.de> writes:
> > > Hey guys,
> > >
> > > I've already mentioned this in a response to dtaht on GitHub, but
> > > again for everyone:
> > >
> > > I was wondering if it's possible to extend the tin statistics by
> > > packets for backlog.
> > Why do you need packets when there's already bytes?
> > Easy: dtaht requested a packets graph with ecn marks, which is also
> > packets, so backlog as bytes do not fit, backlog as packets do.
> > The idea was to do a multi-graph which is one graph with combined
> > stats for all tins and sub graphs for all tins.
> > On the main graph a backlog in packets is available, but I would need
> > to leave out the backlog for the tins, which is somewhat confusing.
> Why not just do both backlogs in bytes?
> There's no counter for ecn marked packets in bytes, so it's impossible to
> implement it that way, too.
> ECN-Marks is in packets, so everything else need to be in packets as
Hmm, so the obvious follow-up question would be "why do you need to have
backlog and number of drops on the same graph?" :)
More information about the Cake