[Cake] Trouble with CAKE
Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
ldir at darbyshire-bryant.me.uk
Sat Dec 14 05:56:38 EST 2019
> On 14 Dec 2019, at 10:35, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir at darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 14 Dec 2019, at 10:01, Thibaut <hacks at slashdirt.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> That's extremely odd. That commit should only affect traffic carrying the LE DSCP, which is not the default.
>>>
>>> Perhaps it was not actually the code change, but triggering a rebuild of the module?
>>
>> No. I tried with and without multiple times: I built, installed, manually unloaded the module, made sure it was unloaded, loaded the new build; just to make sure as I noticed the module doesn’t print anything in dmesg when it’s loaded (feature request: print the current build version when loading, that would be most helpful in these circumstances).
>>
>> There is absolutely no doubt that on my router, with this commit CAKE is broken, without it isn’t.
>>
>> Here’s tc -s output with the broken version:
>>
>> tc -s qdisc show dev wan
>> qdisc cake 800f: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 1200Kbit diffserv3 dual-srchost nat nowash ack-filter split-gso rtt 100.0ms atm overhead 48 no-sce
>> Sent 7711782 bytes 5454 pkt (dropped 144, overlimits 15493 requeues 0)
>> backlog 1616b 2p requeues 0
>> memory used: 140864b of 4Mb
>> capacity estimate: 1200Kbit
>> min/max network layer size: 40 / 1500
>> min/max overhead-adjusted size: 106 / 1749
>> average network hdr offset: 14
>>
>> Bulk Best Effort Voice
>> thresh 75Kbit 1200Kbit 300Kbit
>> target 242.2ms 15.1ms 60.6ms
>> interval 484.5ms 110.1ms 155.6ms
>> pk_delay 0us 60.0ms 26.8ms
>> av_delay 0us 36.7ms 2.0ms
>> sp_delay 0us 17.8ms 1.7ms
>> backlog 0b 1514b 102b
>> pkts 0 5467 133
>> bytes 0 7913444 17970
>> way_inds 0 0 0
>> way_miss 0 44 2
>> way_cols 0 0 0
>> sce 0 0 0
>> marks 0 0 0
>> drops 0 144 0
>> ack_drop 0 0 0
>> sp_flows 0 0 1
>> bk_flows 0 1 0
>> un_flows 0 0 0
>> max_len 0 3028 1118
>> quantum 300 300 300
>>
>> qdisc ingress ffff: parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
>> Sent 218759 bytes 3710 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
>> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>>
>> Here’s the same output with the unbroken version:
>>
>> tc -s qdisc show dev wan
>> qdisc cake 8011: root refcnt 2 bandwidth 1200Kbit diffserv3 dual-srchost nat nowash ack-filter split-gso rtt 100.0ms atm overhead 48 no-sce
>> Sent 3342962 bytes 2328 pkt (dropped 110, overlimits 6422 requeues 0)
>> backlog 4542b 3p requeues 0
>> memory used: 83328b of 4Mb
>> capacity estimate: 1200Kbit
>> min/max network layer size: 40 / 1500
>> min/max overhead-adjusted size: 106 / 1749
>> average network hdr offset: 14
>>
>> Bulk Best Effort Voice
>> thresh 75Kbit 1200Kbit 300Kbit
>> target 242.2ms 15.1ms 60.6ms
>> interval 484.5ms 110.1ms 155.6ms
>> pk_delay 0us 56.8ms 9.9ms
>> av_delay 0us 36.7ms 854us
>> sp_delay 0us 9.4ms 680us
>> backlog 0b 4542b 0b
>> pkts 0 2403 38
>> bytes 0 3509764 4280
>> way_inds 0 0 0
>> way_miss 0 17 1
>> way_cols 0 0 0
>> sce 0 0 0
>> marks 0 0 0
>> drops 0 110 0
>> ack_drop 0 0 0
>> sp_flows 0 0 1
>> bk_flows 0 1 0
>> un_flows 0 0 0
>> max_len 0 1514 294
>> quantum 300 300 300
>>
>> qdisc ingress ffff: parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
>> Sent 106781 bytes 1896 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
>> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>>
>>
>> HTH
>> Thibaut
>
> Which shows most traffic going through Best Effort, whereas the LE DSCP would put it in Bulk, so at this point I’m failing to see the connection between that commit (which changes 3 lookup tables) and the behaviour change.
>
> Can we see output from ’tc -s qdisc’ for the non-broken case please?
Brain fart! The 2 different versions are there and we soe no difference in traffic/tin allocation. However, could we see the ifb4wan instances of cake for both b0rken and unb0rken cases please?
Cheers,
Kevin D-B
gpg: 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20191214/70581dea/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Cake
mailing list