[Cake] Query on ACK

Avakash bhat avakash261 at gmail.com
Fri May 8 02:36:32 EDT 2020

Ok thanks so much for the clarifications.
That cleared it up quite a bit.

Avakash Bhat

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 12:37 PM Sebastian Moeller <moeller0 at gmx.de> wrote:

> I think that you will remove all redundant Backs in one go considerably
> advancing the new ACK in the queue. And more importantly, in most relevant
> modes cake will apply one queue per flow stochastically, so almost all
> packet's in a reverse ACK flow will be ACK with identical 5-tupel....
> On 7 May 2020 08:44:59 CEST, Avakash bhat <avakash261 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the quick response. I also had a followup question.
>> If the ack filter adds the new ack to the tail of the queue after
>> removing an ack from the queue, won't it be starving the ack?
>> The replaced ack was much ahead in the queue than the ack we replaced at
>> the tail right?
>> Thanks,
>> Avakash Bhat
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cake/attachments/20200508/2c55d8ac/attachment.html>

More information about the Cake mailing list