[dtaht/ceropackages] 82ef2f: Update babel 1.3.1, add patch for ECN

[GitHub]

  Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages
  Commit: 82ef2faf9b711d6b929e7eaa545d8aa4fe61ebf8
      https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages/commit/82ef2faf9b711d6b929e7eaa545d8aa4fe61ebf8
  Author: Dave Taht <dave.taht at bufferbloat.net>
  Date:   2012-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 2012)

  Changed paths:
    M net/babelz/Makefile
  R net/babelz/patches/001-babeld-prio.patch

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Update babel 1.3.1, add patch for ECN

This updates babel to git head, which is 1.3.1 based.

Julius disagrees with me as to the need to mark routing packets
with ECN, on a system that is doing probalistic dropping.

He may be right. In my own case, the 'vision' is to ultimately
find some sort of congestion indication on given routes via
the qdisc(s).


  Commit: 92a1e08211256235692c8f5486023d466647b753
      https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages/commit/92a1e08211256235692c8f5486023d466647b753
  Author: Dave Taht <dave.taht at bufferbloat.net>
  Date:   2012-02-11 (Sat, 11 Feb 2012)

  Changed paths:
    A net/babelz/patches/0001-Mark-packets-as-ECN-capable.patch

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Missed the ECN patch entirely.

At some point I would like to be checking for ECN+ECT getting
turned on in multiple userspace based programs, mostly for
logging purposes. Also trying to detect what sorts of
streams get probalistically marked.

This isn't that, merely turning on the ECT bit.


Compare: https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages/compare/36281bf...92a1e08