[Cerowrt-devel] thoughts toward improving cerowrt's DNS and DNSSEC in the next release
dave.taht at gmail.com
Mon Aug 20 14:25:44 EDT 2012
The ongoing DNS issues bug me. For most uses these days I disable bind
entirely, as the 12-20MB it uses up are better used for packets. I do
use it on 3800s but not on 3700v2s.
0) the circular time issue (bug #113) remains a PITA. I was really
scarred by trying to fix that one last year and keep hoping someone
else will fix it...
1) The luci gui has hooks for dnsmasq's "use dns servers advertised by
peer" and "use custom dns servers", which are not tied into the bind
This is confusing users. The way to do that manually is to get the
advertisement once, validate that those servers do NXDOMAIN and
DNSSEC, and toss them into forwarders.conf and enable forwarders.conf
2) Going the the DNS roots with bind, is OK, but it is always faster,
and more reliable to use the ISP provided DNS servers, if they can be
trusted to send DNSSEC information. Comcast's (if you are on comcast)
are fast as heck. I also recently discovered that google DNS does
indeed do dnssec, and although much further away than comcast on the
networks I have access to, they are universally available.
So I am thinking of enabling forwarding by default to google DNS. This
reduces enabling forwarding to another set of servers provided by the
ISP, if usable....
I would like a test of some sort that would prove a delegated ISP's
DNS server was "worthy", this test would include NXDOMAIN, DNSSEC, and
whatever else would be required to validate it as a potential
forwarder to overwrite the forwarders.conf file with that information.
I wouldn't mind establishing a global white/blacklist of DNS servers
that did NXDOMAIN/DNSSEC right/wrong somewhere, either...
dnsmasq may gain DNSSEC by the winter, btw....
3) A related problem is that when behind many walled gardens (a hotel,
for example), going to the DNS roots via bind doesn't work at all,
neither do things like google dns, and usually the forwarder is pretty
crappy in the first place. dnsmasq works in this scenario just fine...
4) A final alternative is to drop bind by default and install it
optionally. While this would lose DNSSEC, and split views and local
delegations, it would buy the integration with dnsmasq, which includes
things like AAAA naming, etc., and get some memory back. (I note that
the OOM issues we're encountering are USEFUL to encounter in that
optimizing for memory use throughout the system is very important, and
I have similar issues on 32MB routers like the picostation/nanostation
even without bind)
Given the amount of time, energy, and money (all 0) I personally have
to deal with these issues, I'm mostly tempted to save on hair by
making dnsmasq the default going forward, and write off bind for now.
Certainly continue to make it available for advanced users, but
install it optionally.
The advantages of having something closer to full blown dns in the
home are not apparent without tighter integration with dhcp, dhcpv6,
ahcp, etc, than presently exists anywhere.
http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-17 is out
More information about the Cerowrt-devel