[Cerowrt-devel] [Babel-users] switching cerowrt to quagga-babeld issues
dave.taht at gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 09:18:43 EDT 2012
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Denis Ovsienko <infrastation at yandex.ru> wrote:
>> Does anybody know where this difference comes from?
> The difference comes from NetworkManager. Its efforts in reproducing high-metric RTPROT_KERNEL routes with low-metric RTPROT_STATIC ones are effectively hiding the kernel issue outside of CeroWrt runtime. Would it be better to add a watchdog shell script, which does the same, or patch the kernel?
I would *much rather* patch the kernel than have a watchdog. However I
don't quite understand
the redistribution issue vs a vs ipv6 here. If I have a "redistribute
kernel" on for ipv4, it does propagate the default route.
(I note that I dislike network manager too as it tries too hard to
work around bugs in the base OS and my own view of the world is far
I'll gladly try pushing a patch up to the mainline if that's what is needed.
> Denis Ovsienko
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-6 is out
More information about the Cerowrt-devel