[Cerowrt-devel] Cerowrt 3.3.8-10 is released
Dave Taht
dave.taht at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 17:51:24 EDT 2012
I enabled crypto not via on the 2.4ghz interface on the -11 release
and it worked.
I DID have to do a clean reboot tho.
5.x is showing a new problem.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> Might have been the bug felix fixed in -11
>
> Might also have corrupted the /etc/config/wireless and/or
> /etc/config/network file too. if you ended up with a wlan0-1 in there
> that would be it...
>
> I too rarely use the gui interface.
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <maciej at soltysiak.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just flashed WNDR3800 with 3.3.8-10 and I get a weird problem.
>> After flashing it works fine, until I change radio0 and 1 wifi settings: set
>> WPA2, set channel, etc.
>> After save&apply, on a cilent PC I am able to see the networks on the list
>> but it's not possible to connect.
>> I believe the client associates with the AP, but it has an APIPA address.
>> Happens to normal and guest interfaces too, even if I don't touch guest
>> interfaces.
>>
>> I logged in over the wire to see if dhcpd was running and it was, but since
>> I can't find logs in the usual place I will now fallback to different
>> firmware.
>>
>> Could that be a known issue?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Maciej Soltysiak <maciej at soltysiak.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Thanks for a good, lengthy update. I wish you pleasant time travelling.
>>>
>>> One question on ECN though.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> - ECN dropping - after several high level conversations with many
>>>> people smarter than me, I decided that dropping ECN packets at a
>>>> certain point made sense. So did everyone else. The "certain point"
>>>> remains puzzling to all, and
>>>> rather than continue to waste time on it in cero I decided to play
>>>> with models instead, and frankly, hope that someone else comes up with
>>>> some sane way to combine ECN and codel sojourn time.
>>>
>>> So if we're dropping ECN packets and not of trying to allow them through
>>> to communicate congestion am I better of enabling ECN on clients on my
>>> network or not?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Maciej
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-6 is out
> with fq_codel!"
--
Dave Täht
http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-6 is out
with fq_codel!"
More information about the Cerowrt-devel
mailing list