[Cerowrt-devel] FQ_Codel lwn draft article review

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen toke at toke.dk
Mon Nov 26 18:58:50 EST 2012

dpreed at reed.com writes:

> iperf is a "hot rod" test. The UDP versions ignores congestion signals
> entirely, and thus is completely irrelevant to bufferbloat.

Well I wasn't going to run it at full speed (whatever that might mean),
but limit it to a relatively low speed, to get the jitter measurements
for UDP in the hope they'd be a decent indication for how a voip call
might fare on the same connection. If you have ideas for a better tool,
I'm all ears. :)

The other tests are done with netperf and good old ping.


Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
toke at toke.dk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20121127/bf83bacf/attachment.sig>

More information about the Cerowrt-devel mailing list