[Cerowrt-devel] tc-stab versus htb on ADSL 8000/700

[Fred Stratton]

I do not yet have sufficient paranoia about buffering.

I have 2 D-Link power line adaptors between the gateway device and the wndr 3800.

http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/130417A/CAIA-TR-130417A.pdf

Perhaps I should attempt to position both before the power line link.

On 15 Aug 2013, at 03:25, Fred Stratton <fredstratton at imap.cc> wrote:

> Excellent. Thank you.
> 
> 
> On 15 Aug 2013, at 03:21, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> They are 802.11e markings. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11e-2005
>> 
>> BE = best effort
>> BK = background
>> VO = Voice
>> CS5 or VI = video (diffserv marking)
>> 
>> This test originated with the wifi work and then ended up being used for tons more stuff. 
>> 
>> And the specification is mine. I was delighted when toke ended up implementing the about 1/3 the spec in 2 months flat. Unfortunately work stalled out since then. We've added a few more interesting tests, but the really hard ones (web and one way delay measurements) have been, well, hard. I've been evaluating owamp's methods for one way delays. There is also a prototype web interface lying around.
>> 
>> The last version of the specification can be seen here, and I do hope one day we get to implementing all of it, and/or, me, revising it. I had hopes to submit it to the ippm ietf group and/or the ITU.
>> 
>> https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat/blob/master/spec/rrule.doc?raw=true
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Fred Stratton <fredstratton at imap.cc> wrote:
>> Thank you. 
>> 
>> It would be useful know what the different traffic classes used by the tool are. BE == Best Effort.
>> 
>> Beyond that I suspect the only person who knows is its Danish author.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 15 Aug 2013, at 02:53, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> The server in germany is demo.tohojo.dk - it's tokes, don't abuse it too much
>>> 
>>> The server in england isn't even in dns: 176.58.107.8 2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:7028
>>> 
>>> The latter can't do more than 8Mbit up.
>>> 
>>> we had most of a deal with google mlabs to dramatically expand the coverage (100+ servers) but it got hung up on details.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Fred Stratton <fredstratton at imap.cc> wrote:
>>> <fq_simplest_tcstab_8000_700a.png>
>>> <fq_simplest_htb_8000_700a.png>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Dave Täht
>>> 
>>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dave Täht
>> 
>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20130815/d473757f/attachment-0002.html>