[Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.21-1 development release
moeller0 at gmx.de
Mon Dec 2 05:44:47 EST 2013
On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for
> dnsmasq. It is completely untested.
> + fresh merge with openwrt
> ++ bunch of ath9k fixes
> + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs)
> - haven't found time to address http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436
> plan to update the machine involved to this version.
> hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someone
> with comcast ipv6 to try this on....
> - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried it
> will do so shortly
The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in its already installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the upgrade. I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try the next time :)
BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place, or what is the busy box mount command missing?
> - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack
> in openwrt in general, but no details.
> I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work
> on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through
> their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now
> and thursday.
> In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep
> digesting your turkey.
> New version of pie should get dropped next week.
> Dave Täht
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
More information about the Cerowrt-devel