[Cerowrt-devel] treating 2.4ghz as -legacy?

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

David Lang <david at lang.hm> writes:

> I believe that Linux allows having both tagged and untagged packets on
> the samy physical interface, so the APs could communicate on a VLAN
> and one could be the gateway to the rest of the network (similar type
> of overhead in this case to GRE tunnels in that all traffic would get
> routed through one system, but I think it would still be less)

What happens to the VLAN tags if the traffic goes through a
non-VLAN-aware switch?

Also, presumably you would need one VLAN/tunnel for each wireless
network (so four in the default cerowrt setup)?

-Toke
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20131219/8c34cd5d/attachment.sig>