[Cerowrt-devel] trivial 6in4 fix(?)

[Dave Taht]

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> wrote:
> Sebastian Moeller <moeller0 at gmx.de> writes:
>
>> As far as I can tell at least VDSL typically means VDSL2 and that
>> probably means PTM instead of ATM. In essence this means you do not
>> have to deal with ATMs 48 payload bytes per 53 byte cell transport
>> inefficiencies. So all you need to deal with is per packet overhead.
>> Then again I am sure you probably know that already. (Sidenote, as far
>> as I understand (so not very far) using ATM for DSL connections with
>> POTS service in the lower frequency range never made much sense at
>> all, the 5 byte ATM header typically was constant and by that just
>> ballast and the 48 byte quantization on the last mile never came with
>> any benefits, but I digress)
>
> Right, thanks. So that means the overhead is constant per (ethernet)
> package?

So what's the MTU on VSDL2? Is PPPOE used?

> -Toke



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html