[Cerowrt-devel] PIE and ADSL2+
moeller0 at gmx.de
Fri Nov 22 04:10:23 EST 2013
On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:08 , Fred Stratton <fredstratton at imap.cc> wrote:
> I have been using PIE instead of fq_codel for approximately 10 days. It works well.
Intrigued by your report I went ahead and tested simple.qos with fq_codel and pie (cerowrt 3.10.18-1) with rrul against demo.tohojo.dk:
/netperf-wrapper -l 300 -H demo.tohojo.dk rrul -p all_scaled -t my_silly_name
Pie (with the default target of 20ms(?) shows around 120 ms ping delay (fq_codel shows 45ms) also the average downlink with fq_codel is roughly 10% higher than with pie. So at least in that test fq_codel seems better than pie. That said, compared to ping latencies up to 300ms (my primary router somehow restricts ;agencies to roughly 300ms) with no AQM, just rate shaping with HTB, pie still keeps the internet more useable.
> Should it?
I think its designers wanted it to be a competent disc, so I guess it should :)
> Has PIE been optimized for ADSL?
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
More information about the Cerowrt-devel