[Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released
Dave Taht
dave.taht at gmail.com
Sat Apr 5 17:51:43 PDT 2014
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra at wpi.edu> wrote:
> Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1:
>
> First, without SQM enabled:
>
> root at cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh
> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction)
> ............................................................
> Download: 52.39 Mbps
> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> Min: 15.281
> 10pct: 18.302
> Median: 28.502
> Avg: 32.891
> 90pct: 56.776
> Max: 74.282
> .............................................................
> Upload: 11.07 Mbps
> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> Min: 15.341
> 10pct: 18.669
> Median: 82.480
> Avg: 126.662
> 90pct: 248.102
> Max: 278.644
>
> And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above:
>
> root at cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh
> Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 seconds in each direction)
> ............................................................
> Download: 32.84 Mbps
> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> Min: 15.623
> 10pct: 16.077
> Median: 17.634
> Avg: 17.982
> 90pct: 19.653
> Max: 23.272
> .............................................................
> Upload: 8.25 Mbps
> Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> Min: 16.001
> 10pct: 17.623
> Median: 19.796
> Avg: 19.820
> 90pct: 21.716
> Max: 23.228
> root at cerowrt:~#
I think we are establishing that you can set downloads to above the
measured value at above 22mbit. Please try again with download 60000,
and pick another number for uploads higher than 80%.
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>> + openwrt merge
>> ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem
>> + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode
>> and wpa+psk enabled...
>>
>> Get it at:
>>
>> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/
>>
>> but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this...
>>
>> - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety of
>> devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a
>> bunch more tomorrow.
>>
>> - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with openwrt's
>> ntp, it seems....
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
More information about the Cerowrt-devel
mailing list