[Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Comcast upped service levels -> WNDR3800 can't cope...

[Toke Høiland-Jørgensen]

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> writes:

> Looking at the code, HTB is considerably more complex than TBF in
> Linux, and not all of the added complexity is due to being classful
> (though a lot of it is). It seems that TBF has dire warnings all over
> it about having limited packet-rate capacity which depends on the
> value of HZ, while HTB has some sort of solution to that problem.

Last I checked, those warnings were out-dated. Everything is in
nanosecond resolution now, including TBF. I've been successfully using
TBF in my experiments at bandwidths up to 100Mbps (on Intel Core2 x86
boxes, that is).

-Toke
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 472 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20140830/fad2b995/attachment.sig>