maciej at soltysiak.com
Tue Feb 25 09:05:42 EST 2014
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0 at gmx.de> wrote:
> TL:DR version, netalyzr probes a buffer depth that while existing has not much relevance on the latency behavior under load for cerowrt.
Yes, it doesn't have much relevance for latency where fq_codel or
similar are employed.
But where it's not (or where fq_codel is defeated by DOS style
traffic), it seems this comes back as a meaningful metric. In the end
codel is workaround for overbuffering, which is not being removed very
More information about the Cerowrt-devel