[Cerowrt-devel] A stable cerowrt release in sight

[Sebastian Moeller]

Hi Dave, hi list,

On May 19, 2014, at 18:29 , Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0 at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Hi Maciej, hi list,
>> 
>> \
>> On May 19, 2014, at 09:30 , Maciej Soltysiak <maciej at soltysiak.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:48 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 15 May 2014 23:36:11 -0700, Dave Taht said:
>>>>> root at bogon-gateway-1:~# uname -a
>>>>> Linux bogon-gateway-1 3.10.36 #1 Fri May 16 01:00:30 PDT 2014 mips GNU/Linux
>>> Noticed the same after upgrade yesterday.
>> 
>>        Note 3.10.40-5 is out and sports a shiny 3.10.40 kernel ;) (Installed yesterday, seems to work, but only lightly tested; did not expose 11an for the 5GHz radio or allow HT40 from the GUI, copying the relevant lines from /etc/config/wireless both made 40MHz wifi work again and exposed the settings in the GUI; I seem to recall that this was reported on the openwrt list as well, so is not a cerowrt specific issue...)
> 
> ? I saw that the wifi recog routine had changed is it not configuring n?

	Nope, it only offered either "auto" or "a" for the 5GHz radio, for radio0 it offered "n" out of the box. I hope this is just transient and will be fixed upstream...

> 
>> 
>>> BTW. sysupgrade didn't preserver a single setting, is that expected?
>>> Was upgrading form 3.10.28 or something.
>> 
>>        INteresting question, this could be related to the constant flux in openwrt trunk, or could just be a plain bug there. (Just as the inability of keeping gthe settings while sys upgrading from the GUI was an openwrt bug, that got fixed there...)
> 
> I do look forward to BB freezing.

	;)


Best Regards
	Sebastian

>> 
>>> 
>>>> (it is the patch, not the kernel, that is important)
>>> Well, if you look closely the 3.10.40 contains a bugfix for
>>> n_tty_write() : CVE-2014-0196
>> 
>>        This looks like a local issue only, since the only local user on cerowrt is root I do not think that this really affects us.
>> 
>> best regards
>>        sebastian
>> 
>>> That particular kernel might be important. Sorry for my ignorance, but
>>> are we affected?
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Maciej Soltysiak
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dave Täht
> 
> NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article