[Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 confusion with source specific gateways.

Robert Bradley robert.bradley1 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 26 17:03:29 EST 2014

On 26/11/14 07:40, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> 2601:c:ce00:9d01 is 2601:000c:ce00:9d01
> 2601:c:ce00:9d1 is 2601:000c:ce00:09d1
> So no? :)

The issue is that this is supposedly a /60, and so only addresses in the
range 2601:c:ce00:9d0x::/60 are valid.  The question is actually about
how CeroWRT subnet hints cope with nybble alignment of subnets as
opposed to byte/octet alignments.

Robert Bradley

More information about the Cerowrt-devel mailing list