[Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 confusion with source specific gateways.
Robert Bradley
robert.bradley1 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 26 17:03:29 EST 2014
On 26/11/14 07:40, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> 2601:c:ce00:9d01 is 2601:000c:ce00:9d01
> 2601:c:ce00:9d1 is 2601:000c:ce00:09d1
>
> So no? :)
The issue is that this is supposedly a /60, and so only addresses in the
range 2601:c:ce00:9d0x::/60 are valid. The question is actually about
how CeroWRT subnet hints cope with nybble alignment of subnets as
opposed to byte/octet alignments.
--
Robert Bradley
More information about the Cerowrt-devel
mailing list