[Cerowrt-devel] Routing limit question

Ernesto Elias ernestogelias at gmail.com
Wed Oct 22 15:39:54 EDT 2014 

Hello Sebastian, well I followed your directions and when I inputted the
command git clone git at https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper

It said too many arguments...
What do I do now?
On Oct 21, 2014 4:23 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0 at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi Ernesto,
>
> so I would recommend to first install git from a terminal in your ubuntu
> virtual machine:
>         sudo apt-get install git
>
> then create a directory where to store horse netperf-wrapper:
>         mkdir -p ~/bufferbloat ; cd ~/bufferbloat
>
> then clone the netperf-wrapper repository:
>         git clone git at https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper
>
> now you can test what is missing by calling:
>         ./netperf-wrapper
> this will most likely complain about missing components, please send the
> output of this command so we can take it from there.
>
> In the unexpected case that the above command just success please try:
>         date ; ping -c 10 netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net ; ./netperf-wrapper
> --ipv4 -l 300 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net rrul -p all_scaled
> --disable-log -t netperf-wrapper_test
>
> and again send the output…
>
> And finally if all the above succeeds please try
>         ./netperf-wrapper —gui
>
> and send the output
>
> Hope that helps...
>
> Best Regards
>         Sebastian
>
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2014, at 04:30 , Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Alright Sebastian, I've managed to get the virtual box and Ubuntu
> running on the computer and I went to go see the packages I have no idea
> which one to install there's a whole lot of them. Forgive me this is all
> new to me. Which one do I acquire and how to install it?
> >
> > On Oct 20, 2014 4:11 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0 at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Ernesto,
> >
> > On Oct 20, 2014, at 03:08 , Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Well Sebastian sir, I am taking your advice and I'm on windows 7 so
> right now I'm downloading virtualbox and xubuntu. I don't know if there is
> one that you guys recommend.
> >
> >         I only tested ubuntu 12.04LTS, but certainly I would try the
> current 14.07 LTS today.
> >
> > >  Well... I am new to all this stuff so I'm asking you to please help
> me on the subject like after everything is up and running on the computer,
> >
> >         Oh, sure I am happy to help you with getting better data ;)
> >
> > > what other steps do I do afterwards and forgive me like I said I'm new
> ot all this stuff because I want to be able to find my link capacity when
> using SQM. and Thanks for the help!
> >
> >         First step is getting the vitalized linux up and running, then
> python 2.7 (I assume that python will be part of the distribution), with
> matplotlib; and finally netperf-wrapper. I assume it might take a bit
> trying to figure out all the required packets installed, but it should be
> reasonably quick to get this up and running… Just give it a try and let me
> know if/where you get stuck
> >         It would be most excellent if you could document the whole
> procedure somehow so we could put it somewhere on the net to make it easier
> in the future...
> >
> > Best Regards
> >         Sebastian
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0 at gmx.de>
> wrote:
> > > Hi Ernesto,
> > >
> > > I would recommend to not run the netperf processes on the router you
> want to assess, if possible. Shaping at the rates you are interested in
> probably will take 100% CPU of the router, so there is no slack for running
> net server and netperf instances at the same time. Also I would recommend
> to use netperf-wrapper (https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper)
> instead of netperfrunner.sh as it allows so much nicer visualization of the
> queueing over time. netperfrunner.sh is great tool for quick testing and
> figuring out link capacities and worst case latency under load increase
> (LULI), but for more thorough comparisons it ain’t made. Netperf-wrapper
> will run under linux and macosx natively, but will also run (well enough)
> in a linux virtual machine on a windows box.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > >         Sebastian
> > >
> > >
> > > On Oct 19, 2014, at 21:16 , Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > root at cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh
> > > > 2014-10-19 15:10:27 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4
> streams down a
>
>                    nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60
> seconds.
> > > >  Download:  30.49 Mbps
> > > >    Upload:  46.52 Mbps
> > > >   Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> > > >       Min: 19.848
> > > >     10pct: 19.958
> > > >    Median: 20.743
> > > >       Avg: 21.229
> > > >     90pct: 22.739
> > > >       Max: 30.491
> > > > root at cerowrt:~# /usr/lib/CeroWrtScripts/netperfrunner.sh
> > > > 2014-10-19 15:11:54 Testing netperf.bufferbloat.net (ipv4) with 4
> streams down a
>
>                    nd up while pinging gstatic.com. Takes about 60
> seconds.
> > > >  Download:  7.02 Mbps
> > > >    Upload:  63.68 Mbps
> > > >   Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss)
> > > >       Min: 21.690
> > > >     10pct: 117.997
> > > >    Median: 153.983
> > > >       Avg: 150.851
> > > >     90pct: 180.777
> > > >       Max: 190.265
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The first result i gotten by only shaping the uplink and the second
> results are for only shaping the downlink...
> > > >
> > > > and for the testing i put 0 on the for the downlink and uplink when
> I was testing for the opposite. and I put 50000 in it when I was shaping it
> for the test. Am I doing it right ?
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > shape the download only, then measure. shape the upload only, then
> measure.
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Ernesto Elias <
> ernestogelias at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Oh OK I mean I was just wondering because I was trying to figure
> out what
> > > > > should I have put in the sqm tab because I saw that the wndr3800
> tops out at
> > > > > 50 mbit combined of download and upload right? As of now I have it
> at 25/25
> > > > > on the page. Is that right or should I just shape the upload?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Oct 19, 2014 2:24 PM, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that they
> had
> > > > >> SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down
> > > > >>
> > > > >> So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we
> start
> > > > >> peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements can
> tell.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias <
> ernestogelias at gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > Hello everyone!
> > > > >> > I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went back
> to the
> > > > >> > older
> > > > >> > submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer for
> it. But in
> > > > >> > my
> > > > >> > search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From what I
> seen
> > > > >> > about
> > > > >> > setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. I'm
> just
> > > > >> > wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I have
> verizon
> > > > >> > fios
> > > > >> > and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much!
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > > >> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > > > >> > Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > > >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Dave Täht
> > > > >>
> > > > >> thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dave Täht
> > > >
> > > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > > > Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20141022/9572ed79/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Cerowrt-devel mailing list