[Cerowrt-devel] Correct syntax for cake commands and atm issues.
fredstratton at imap.cc
Fri Jul 10 10:52:40 EDT 2015
You are absolutely correct.
I tried both a numeric overhead value, and alternatively 'pppoe-vcmux'
and 'ether-fcs' in the build I crafted based on r46006, which is lupin
undeclared version 2. Everything works as stated.
On lupin undeclared version 4, the current release based on r46117, the
values were not recognised.
I had cake running on a Lantiq ADSL gateway running the same r46006
build. Unfortunately this was bricked by attempts to get homenet
working, so I have nothing to report about gateway usage at present.
On 10/07/15 13:57, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> You're already using correct syntax - I've written it to be quite
> lenient and use sensible defaults for missing information. There are
> several sets of keywords and parameters which are mutually orthogonal,
> and don't depend on each other, so "besteffort" has nothing to do with
> "overhead" or "atm".
> What's probably happening is that you're using a slightly old version
> of the cake kernel module which lacks the overhead parameter entirely,
> but a more up to date tc which does support it. We've seen this
> combination crop up ourselves recently.
> - Jonathan Morton
More information about the Cerowrt-devel