[Cerowrt-devel] Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" [still] didn't

[Dave Taht]

huh? I pulled from the repo you were committing to, I thought.... is
that not correct?

I can do a build of a newer cake... before I get on the plane...

On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> It looks like your cake is new enough to support set associative hashing,
> but not the new overhead handling. The ATM flag was put in a long time ago.
>
> Looking at the code which grabs those options (cake_change), there doesn't
> seem to be a way to detect whether an unsupported option was provided by
> userspace, unless nla_parse_nested returns an error if the provided option
> struct would be overflowed. Clearly it doesn't, but just truncates it to
> fit.
>
> - Jonathan Morton



-- 
Dave Täht
worldwide bufferbloat report:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
And:
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast