[Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't)
moeller0 at gmx.de
Sun Jun 28 14:55:09 EDT 2015
Hi Dave, hi List,
On Jun 28, 2015, at 20:04 , Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> htb + cake is the wrong configuration. :)
“Wrong” might be a bit hard, but certainly not the preferred solution. During my tests on your box simple.qos resulted in the following:
root at davedesk2:/usr/lib/sqm# tc -d qdisc
qdisc fq_codel 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 limit 1024p flows 1024 quantum 300 target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn
qdisc cake 8030: dev eth1 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 4500Kbit diffserv4 flows raw
qdisc ingress ffff: dev eth1 parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
qdisc cake 8031: dev ifb4eth1 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 45Mbit besteffort flows atm overhead 0
qdisc bfifo 800b: dev wlan1 root refcnt 5 limit 16Kb
qdisc cake 8008: dev wlan0 root refcnt 5 unlimited diffserv4 flows raw
So either I mixed things up later or Mikael’s simple.qos somehow got stale. Anyway, there is work thee for me to do to fix this up properly.
> cake has an integral bandwidth limiter and diffserv, there should be
> no htb here and it looked like their was. I have only been using the
> "simplest" qdisc, possibly the script for the simple qdisc is wrong?
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> To be honest, HTB + cake isn't really the preferred configuration.
>> - Jonathan Morton
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> Dave Täht
> worldwide bufferbloat report:
> What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
More information about the Cerowrt-devel