[Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanog

[Aaron Wood]

But until the silicon vendors update _their_ forks of OpenWRT, commercially
available home routers won't have these benefits.  Because the home router
market is dominated by packaged reference designs from one of a very small
number of companies that actually make all the chipsets (Dave, I know you
know this, I'm mostly just choir-preaching myself).

-Aaron

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:

> There's nothing new here, but it was a nice rant to get out of my system:
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.operators.nanog/128201
>
> Of late, I have been taking a page from Linus Torvalds' playbook, in
> realizing that "on the internet, no-one can hear you being subtle",
> and BOY, am I done with that.
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel/attachments/20150301/a48c8a51/attachment-0002.html>