[Cerowrt-devel] CeroWrt bits not in OpenWrt (renamed thread)
moeller0 at gmx.de
Fri Mar 13 11:26:17 EDT 2015
On Mar 12, 2015, at 22:59 , Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> wrote:
>>> sqm-scripts / luci-app-sqm is only available from CC (trunk). The CC
>>> version can be installed manually, but it will complain & leave you
>>> warnings about it on every subsequent package install.
>> Note that we've been discussing backporting it to BB, but had one outstanding bug that we fixed recently. Been waiting until that fix has been out in CC for sufficiently long to weed out any adverse effects, then we'll get it into BB as well if possible :)
> I wouldn't mind restarting work on cake, either, as it simplifies the
> sqm-scripts tremendously, and (in it's present form) is mildly faster.
> Also exploring the existing policing options would be good at the
> higher rates. For an example of use see the last set of comments on
> wondershaper must die. And then there's "bobbie", which would be worth
> a paper for anyone that wants to talk to me then write it….
I guess, it should be relatively simple to introduce a sign to sqm’s bandwidth fields, with positive denoting HTB shaping, negative simple policing (and zero stays at no shaping or policing); it is not that we have not already “overloaded” the bandwidth field already ;). That way we can keep everything in simple.qos making it more likely people will actually be able to test it… (Currently I have a temporary 100/40 Mbps link so I want to try the policer anyway ;) )
Now if thee was a cerowrt re-spin that added cake, that would be great
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> Dave Täht
> Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
More information about the Cerowrt-devel