[Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] RE : Save WiFi from the FCC - DEADLINE is in 3 days *September* 8
mcr at sandelman.ca
Tue Sep 8 10:45:06 EDT 2015
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
> So I think a constructive approach would be to try to say how the FCC
> concern can be solved or at least mitigated in a FOSS world. Do we have
> any ideas?
The FCC needs to think bigger: restricting who can make/design/update
(fundamentally: 'own') wifi devices leads to millions of compromised devices
attacking the Internet.
If you think of the wifi spectrum as a small component of a bigger "Internet"
spectrum, and that FCC really cares about all of it, then it makes no sense
to manage each part in isolation.
Or to put it differently: if company X's locked down wifi device is attacking
the Internet, then maybe their wifi license should be revoked.
> Because I can understand that regulators whose job it is to make sure
> devices follow the rules have a problem with FOSS code that lets people
> do whatever they want.
Manufacturer devices that have security holes in them let black hats do
whatever they want with the device.
> Do we really want for regulators to bring back the vans who might roll
> around and impose a fine because you were running OpenWRT and happened
> to set the output power too high for whatever local regulation was in
Yes, actually, I do.
I'm starting to be convinced that the Bell FIBE "wireless TV" eats more than
it's fair share of wifi. I have no way to prove it without that Van.
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr at sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Cerowrt-devel