[Cerowrt-devel] dlte
Mikael Abrahamsson
swmike at swm.pp.se
Wed Dec 5 02:44:58 EST 2018
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018, Dave Taht wrote:
> I expect dave reed to comment, so I'll withhold mine for now
>
> https://kurti.sh/pubs/dLTE-Johnson-HotNets-2018.pdf
When I read the first page I was hopeful, then unfortunately I got
disappointed and just quickly scanned the rest. It's still tunneled and
the same architecture, just more distributed.
I'd prefer if the device had two radios and could handle its own handover
for most traffic. Most traffic today is streaming video so when you want
to do handover just attach to the new radio, get new address, deprecate
the old address, open new connections using the new address/radio close
connections based on the old address, and move on.
Traffic that needs to be always the same can be tunneled, but most traffic
has no need for this. My guesstimate is that 90-95% of traffic doesn't
need mobility and doesn't need to go via some tunnel to some core-node.
It's also frustrating to talk "wifi" with mobile people, because they
conflate "wifi" into multiple things at once. For me it's just that people
want well working wireless access, and they couldn't care less how they
get it. The more seamless the better. In that aspect this proposal is kind
of neat in that I could make my residential radios join a larger network
(similar to eduroam).
So yes, I think this proposal has some merit.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the Cerowrt-devel
mailing list