From dave.taht at gmail.com Wed Oct 2 14:44:27 2019 From: dave.taht at gmail.com (Dave Taht) Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 11:44:27 -0700 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Development and management of collective network and cloud computing infrastructures Message-ID: This just went by on the battlemesh list. It's a pretty good read. http://dsg.ac.upc.edu/sites/default/files/dsg/phd_roger.pdf -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 From matt at lackof.org Thu Oct 10 12:45:23 2019 From: matt at lackof.org (Matt Taggart) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:45:23 -0700 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] GL-MV1000 Message-ID: <5c8cd31f-b168-991f-3652-4fdaa9bdeace@lackof.org> Another little 3 gig port SBC https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-mv1000/ https://store.gl-inet.com/pages/brume-gl-mv1000-edge-computing-vpn-router Marvell Armada 88F3720, Dual-Core ARM Cortex-A53 @1.0GHz DDR4 1GB/ FLASH 16MB + EMMC 8GB 3 x Gigabit ports, 1 x USB 2.0, 1 x MicroSD slot, 1 x USB Type-C power port, 1 x reset button, and 1 x mode switch MSRP $129 Similar to espressobin (which I am still playing with, anyone else have experience with it and SQM?) found here https://forum.armbian.com/topic/11742-another-3720-box-glinet-mv1000/ -- Matt Taggart matt at lackof.org From dave.taht at gmail.com Wed Oct 23 02:56:58 2019 From: dave.taht at gmail.com (Dave Taht) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 23:56:58 -0700 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems-09.txt Message-ID: has anyone here had much chance to review this? -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 From dave.taht at gmail.com Thu Oct 24 14:23:03 2019 From: dave.taht at gmail.com (Dave Taht) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:23:03 -0700 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] my arin NRO board candidacy Message-ID: A while back I decided to run for ARIN's (the american registry of internet numbers) NRO board, and attend their conference and election next week in dallas texas. While I decided to run to discuss the ipv4 extensions project, I certainly intend to raise issues of direct concern here (bufferbloat, binary blobs, wif, 5g, ipv6, middlebox problems) at a pretty high level and in a place I've not done so before, in front of people that have never heard of them. Some details on the meeting and agenda are here: https://www.arin.net/ARIN44 The list of candidates is here: https://www.arin.net/announcements/20191009/ A bit about what the NRO does is here: https://www.arin.net/about/welcome/nronc/ As usual, I'm pretty broke, if anyone can help throw in for airfare (spare points anyone?) and lodging, it's always appreciated. paypal: dave.taht at gmail.com patreon: https://www.patreon.com/dtaht gofundme: https://www.gofundme.com/manage/savewifi -- Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740 From evyncke at cisco.com Wed Oct 23 17:33:10 2019 From: evyncke at cisco.com (Eric Vyncke (evyncke)) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 21:33:10 -0000 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems-09.txt In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <73D77519-902D-4976-BB33-2FDE6946F28E@cisco.com> Ray and Christophe and others, As the responsible AD for this draft, would you mind forwarding/adding mboned at ietf.org to the recipient list? So that authors can read your valuable comments? Thank you -éric From: homenet on behalf of "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" Date: Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 10:55 To: Dave Taht Cc: HOMENET , cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems-09.txt Dave Taht wrote on 23/10/2019 08:56: has anyone here had much chance to review this? Thanks for the prompt. >From a pure Homenet perspective, it reinforces that L3 routing is the correct solution for segmenting networks where end nodes have different characteristics. e.g. battery powered or different underlying LAN technology. And maybe we need a firewall in front of those segments to prevent inbound scanning traffic overloading the link. Other than that I'm not sure it says much more than "Multicast is great for efficiency, until it isn't". Section 3.2.4: > On a wired network, there is not a huge difference between unicast, multicast and broadcast traffic. I'd dispute this statement as being overly generic. Anyway, it doesn't add much to the discussion (about wireless). The majority of modern wired Ethernets are actually effectively point to point networks, with multicast and broadcast being emulated in silicon or software. Although maybe having a less visible impact than on wireless, multicast and broadcast can also have some similar operational impact on wired networks (waking nodes unnecessarily, switching via a slow (software) path in the main processor, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6583 etc.). -- regards, RayH -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From toke at redhat.com Sun Oct 27 06:18:11 2019 From: toke at redhat.com (Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?=) Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:18:11 -0000 Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] [Make-wifi-fast] my arin NRO board candidacy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <87zhhmjxuq.fsf@toke.dk> Dave Taht writes: > A while back I decided to run for ARIN's (the american registry of > internet numbers) NRO board, and attend their conference and election > next week in dallas texas. > > While I decided to run to discuss the ipv4 extensions project, I > certainly intend to raise issues of direct concern here (bufferbloat, > binary blobs, wif, 5g, ipv6, middlebox problems) at a pretty high > level and in a place I've not done so before, in front of people that > have never heard of them. Woohoo, go get 'em! If you ever run for the RIPE board, I'll definitely vote for you! ;) -Toke