[Cerowrt-devel] risc-v options?

John Yates john at yates-sheets.org
Wed Dec 1 16:36:05 EST 2021

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:59 PM Arun Ray Ramadorai
via Cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> Architecturally I would say it is still about 8yrs behind ARM.
> Cache performance, power management, and virtualization in
> particular are not mature yet and need consistent investment
> of time and dollars to get RISC-V to the same level. That
> having been said I do see a lot of companies looking at it as
> a way to reduce their licensing costs. I think the motivation of
> the community should be to encourage corporate investment
> with the expectation that the resulting development is made
> available to everyone.

Reminds me of SEMATECH:



More information about the Cerowrt-devel mailing list