[Cerowrt-devel] risc-v options?

[John Yates]

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:59 PM Arun Ray Ramadorai
via Cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> Architecturally I would say it is still about 8yrs behind ARM.
> Cache performance, power management, and virtualization in
> particular are not mature yet and need consistent investment
> of time and dollars to get RISC-V to the same level. That
> having been said I do see a lot of companies looking at it as
> a way to reduce their licensing costs. I think the motivation of
> the community should be to encourage corporate investment
> with the expectation that the resulting development is made
> available to everyone.

Reminds me of SEMATECH:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEMATECH

/john