[Cerowrt-devel] risc-v options?

[Dave Taht]

and pspn looked interesting at 400Gbit: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.03536.pdf

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:33 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> also, a 2.5ghz, 16 core chip was open sourced last month.
>
> https://www.cnx-software.com/2021/10/20/alibaba-open-source-risc-v-cores-xuantie-e902-e906-c906-and-c910/
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 4:23 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:52 PM David P. Reed <dpreed at deepplum.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > For what?
> >
> > Because it's shiny. Because I don't care for the owner of softbank and
> > arm very much. Because at least the core is open source, and I'd
> > really like to try out some long held ideas about reducing context
> > switch latency. And there's a couple instructions I'd like to add.
> >
> > >I have recently gotten a MicroSemi RISC-V SoC board with embedded FPGA (or maybe it is better thought of as an FPGA board with multicore hard logic RISC-V host.) Runs Linux very fast. It's not set up to be a router, though - not unless I populate its PCIe  slot with NICs. Standard Linux drivers for PCIe devices all work quite well, so far.
> >
> > how fast can it context switch? (irtt bench)
> >
> > I am impressed that it works with anything on pcie.
> >
> > I was mostly dismissing risc-v as a toy that could never catch up to
> > arm 3 years ago, but with the enormous chinese investment in it...
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > These early 64 bit RISC-V implementations are pretty darn good, but unlike Intel's Xeons, they don't yet handle memory channel performance very well.
> >
> > Intel has always had an advantage in on-chip cache.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (The 32-bit RISC-V's are really competing with ARM based microcontrollers for embedded systems. I don't find them interesting, though I have a couple sample boards with 32 bit RISC-V cores).
> >
> > I don't find 32 bit risc-v interesting. I did fiddle with the 128 bit
> > risc-v stuff for a while.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > A random guess on my part: even consumer routers will be moving to 64-bit processor designs in the next couple years.
> >
> > Many already have.
> >
> > > That's because the price difference is getting quite small, as a percentage of total product cost, and because it is hard to buy "small memory address space" DIMMs. I could be wrong, but extrapolation from today's trends suggests that is more likely than not.
> >
> > 802.11ax standards require - no joke - a 2MByte buffer per station.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Friday, November 26, 2021 3:02pm, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht at gmail.com> said:
> > >
> > > > has anyone tried the latest generations of risc-v?
> > > >
> > > > https://linuxgizmos.com/17-sbc-runs-linux-on-allwinner-d1-risc-v-soc/
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> > > > https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
> > > >
> > > > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > > > Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> > https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
> >
> > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>
>
>
> --
> I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
>
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC



-- 
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org

Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC