<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I don't think that the QDISC variable was used in the Sugarland version of the script.<div><br></div><div>What do you have for IFACE?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>-Bill</div><div><br><div><div>On Jan 5, 2013, at 5:25 PM, <a href="mailto:dpreed@reed.com">dpreed@reed.com</a> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><font face="times new roman" size="2"><div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; ">I am using 3.7.1-1, and comparing my simple_qos.sh config with yours, I don't see any QDISC=... line in yours.</div><div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; ">So is it possible you need that? The egress() interface setup in simple_qos.sh uses that to set the queue discipline.</div><p style="margin:0;padding:0;"> </p><div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; ">-----Original Message-----<br>From: "William Katsak" <<a href="mailto:wkatsak@gmail.com">wkatsak@gmail.com</a>><br>Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 4:37pm<br>To: "<a href="mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net">cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net">cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>><br>Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Anyone using PPPoE with Sugarland?<br><br></div>
<div id="SafeStyles1357424289"><div style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; ">Hello,<br><br>I am experimenting with using Cero/Sugarland on a PPPoE connection, and can't seem to find a config of simple_qos that works well.<br><br>The service is DSL, PPPoE, 3M/768K. Without any qos, the router works well, as expected. When I try to use simple_qos, the clients have trouble loading websites (hangs while loading, etc).<br><br>Netlyzer shows upstream buffering of about 650ms, consistently. I have tried various higher and lower values for UPLINK and DOWNLINK, but nothing seems to help. Anyway, I think 15-20% below link should be fine.<br><br>Here is my config:<br>UPLINK=550<br>DOWNLINK=1900<br>DEV=ifb0<br>IFACE=ge00<br>DEPTH=42<br>TC=/usr/sbin/tc<br>FLOWS=8000<br>PERTURB="perturb 0" # Permutation is costly, disable<br>FLOWS=16000 # <br>BQL_MAX=3000 # it is important to factor this into the RED calc<br><br>CEIL=$UPLINK<br>MTU=1492<br>ADSLL=""<br>PPOE=yes<br><br>Couple of things I am unsure about:<br>1) Should the IFACE be ge00 or pppoe-ge00?<br>2) Should the MTU be the pppoe mtu (1492) or the ethernet (1500)<br><br>One last thing: I have the lan split up into VLAN interfaces se00.1, se00.100, and se00.200. Everything otherwise works as expected with these, but could the naming be breaking something?<br><br>If anyone is willing to share a working configuration it would be much appreciated.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Bill Katsak<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Cerowrt-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net">Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel</div>
</div></font></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>