<div dir="ltr">It's been running fine for me this morning. I didn't experience the odhcp6d issue personally (21 day uptime on 3.10.18-1). Thanks.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div>-- <br>David P.</div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Dave Taht <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com" target="_blank">dave.taht@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
As best as I recall it was needed for ext4 and btrfs support on<br>
mounting external devices, but that was years ago.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Sebastian Moeller <<a href="mailto:moeller0@gmx.de">moeller0@gmx.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Dave,<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Dec 2, 2013, at 02:07 , Dave Taht <<a href="mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com">dave.taht@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> This is nothing more than a resync with openwrt and a bugfix for<br>
>> dnsmasq. It is completely untested.<br>
>><br>
>> + fresh merge with openwrt<br>
>> ++ bunch of ath9k fixes<br>
>> + update to dnsmasq 2.68rc4 (fixes cname and a few other bugs)<br>
>><br>
>> - haven't found time to address <a href="http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436" target="_blank">http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/436</a><br>
>> plan to update the machine involved to this version.<br>
>> hope to get more reports from the field. ? Would like to find someone<br>
>> with comcast ipv6 to try this on....<br>
>><br>
>> - the /sbin/mount bug explanation sounded plausible but haven't tried it<br>
>> will do so shortly<br>
><br>
> The quickest test should be to deinstall mount-utils before running sys upgrade (as far as I know mount-utils is the source of the incompatible mount binary). The new cerowrt will automatically bring in its already installed mount-utils, so everything should work after the upgrade. I have not tested this yet, but I assume this is what I'll try the next time :)<br>
> BTW, what is the reason we need mount-utils in the first place, or what is the busy box mount command missing?<br>
><br>
> best regards<br>
> sebastian<br>
><br>
>><br>
>> - have several reports of a successful "fragmentation?" crash attack<br>
>> in openwrt in general, but no details.<br>
>><br>
>> I'm taking a bunch of machines into the lab thursday and hope to work<br>
>> on the latter problem while putting several new machines/OSes through<br>
>> their paces... It seemes likely I will do another build between now<br>
>> and thursday.<br>
>><br>
>> In short, not a lot of reason to try this release. Feel free to keep<br>
>> digesting your turkey.<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_8U4j51lI" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5_8U4j51lI</a><br>
>><br>
>> New version of pie should get dropped next week.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Dave Täht<br>
>><br>
>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: <a href="http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html" target="_blank">http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html</a><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net">Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Dave Täht<br>
<br>
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: <a href="http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html" target="_blank">http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Cerowrt-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net">Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>