<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
I suggest you read the cero wiki. This details the original design
decisions. On the router,<br>
<br>
ssh in, and use<br>
<br>
mtd -r erase fs_data<br>
<br>
to recover to defaults. See <br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/mtd">http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/mtd</a><br>
<br>
If you ever have used BB daily builds, you can type this in your
sleep.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/02/14 10:05, Vincent Frentzel
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACCCjEVE+Un+M2vKm=SaHw-7-mPqVCByxZToQX-Xmz43j2YUYg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
I could be totally out for lunch here, but
shouldn't that be se00 (secure ethernet) instead of
eth0.1? At least on 3.10.28-14 neuter "ifconfig" nor
/etc/config/network mentions eth0.1 at all. Could you post
both of these (so the result of calling ifconfig on a
terminal on the router and the content of
/etc/config/network ;), I am sure you know what I meant,
just dying to be verbose for the sake of people stumbling
over the archive of the mailing list)<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Hi Sebastian,<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Understood. I will come back to you with the ifconfig.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>For info, I did try both se00 and eth0.1. The reason I
stuck with eth0.1 was that barrier breaker usually uses
eth0.1 for br-lan with vlan enabled (eth0.1 appears in
Luci in cerowrt). So in cero I just reenabled the vlan and
used a type "bridge" on the network section (I renamed
this section se99 instead of se00). <br>
<br>
I then added se99 it to the "lan" zone of the firewall. In
the wireless config I specified network as "se99" instead
of sw10 and sw00. I confirmed that the setup was correct
in the web interface where eth0.1 sw00 and sw10 appeared
under the new bridged interface ( there was the nice icon
with the iface in brackets).<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>I went on to modify the dhcp config of se00 and changed
se00 occurences for se99 and commented out entries for
sw10/sw00. --> this would give me dhcp running on my
new bridge.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>After a dnsmasq restart dnsmasq.conf shows the dhcp
ranges line with interface se99. (I was expecting to see
br-se99 but maybe that file is alias aware, could be wrong
here).<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>After a network restart I lost connectivity on cable.
Wireless was working.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>I played a tad more and eventually lost wifi as well
and had to reflash the router via tftp/factory image
(maybe there is a reset trick you could give me to avoid
this step).<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Are you running cerowrt in bridge mode? If yes could
you share your network/firewall/dhcp config? Is there
another file I should have edited and missed?<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,<br>
V<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net">Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>