<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    There are no button presses to bring the box back, as you can with
    some TP-Link routers.<br>
    <br>
    You could use a serial lead if you opened the case. No one has
    mentioned trying this with cero on the list.<br>
    <br>
    So far, all bridging attempts with cero have been unproductive.
    However sound the theoretical approach, they have not worked in
    practice.<br>
    <br>
    As you would expect, subnetting a /48 works. DT has got subnetting
    working with a /60 in the last 2 weeks.<br>
    <br>
    That is the current state of play.<br>
    <br>
    6relayd  on OpenWRT is very difficult to configure. dnsmasq tends to
    be simpler.<br>
    <br>
    Perhaps Kelley has something to say about configuration with, say, a
    /64 provided by free.fr<br>
    <br>
    I know of only one ISP which provides a /48 to customers.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/02/14 11:35, Vincent Frentzel
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CACCCjEU+OY7qxNy8OqaqiRRDNHdV=q4sb2FW2-YsJGAzsVF2GQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>
          <div>I am familiar with that command :) Was wondering if there
            was something I could do when I cannot ssh into the router.
            As mentioned above, when trying to configure the bridge I
            hit a point where I could nt get in the router anymore.<br>
            <br>
          </div>
          I understand the design decisions of the project and far from
          me the idea of challenging them :) I was simply trying to
          provide an alternative config with a standard bridge ethernet
          + wifi for reference. I believe that in the case mentioned by
          Sebastian (multiple, mobile, devices accessing resources
          across segments) bridging is a simple way forward.<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        In my particular case, correct route propagation is a problem on
        IPV6 (im not running babel) and I have only 2 wifi clients...
        Bridging has never shown any perf issues in the past so I 'd
        like to switch back to this simpler setup. I can picture that
        this might not fit the bill for more intensive use cases.<br>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Fred
          Stratton <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:fredstratton@imap.cc" target="_blank">fredstratton@imap.cc</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> So much for memory<br>
              <br>
              mtd -r erase rootfs_data<br>
              <br>
              is the correct invocation.
              <div>
                <div class="h5"><br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <div>On 24/02/14 10:18, Fred Stratton wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote type="cite"> I suggest you read the cero
                    wiki. This details the original design decisions. On
                    the router,<br>
                    <br>
                    ssh in, and use<br>
                    <br>
                    mtd -r erase fs_data<br>
                    <br>
                    to recover to defaults. See <br>
                    <br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/mtd"
                      target="_blank">http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/techref/mtd</a><br>
                    <br>
                    If you ever have used  BB daily builds, you can type
                    this in your sleep.<br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    <div>On 24/02/14 10:05, Vincent Frentzel wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote type="cite">
                      <div dir="ltr"><br>
                        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                          <div class="gmail_quote">
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                              style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
                              #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br>
                                      I could be totally out for lunch
                              here, but shouldn't that be se00 (secure
                              ethernet) instead of eth0.1? At least on <a
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="tel:3.10.28-14" value="+13102814"
                                target="_blank">3.10.28-14</a> neuter
                              "ifconfig" nor /etc/config/network
                              mentions eth0.1 at all. Could you post
                              both of these (so the result of calling
                              ifconfig on a terminal on the router and
                              the content of /etc/config/network ;), I
                              am sure you know what I meant, just dying
                              to be verbose for the sake of people
                              stumbling over the archive of the mailing
                              list)<br>
                            </blockquote>
                            <div><br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            <div>Hi Sebastian,<br>
                            </div>
                            <div><br>
                            </div>
                            <div>Understood. I will come back to you
                              with the ifconfig.<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            <div>For info, I did try both se00 and
                              eth0.1. The reason I stuck with eth0.1 was
                              that barrier breaker usually uses eth0.1
                              for br-lan with vlan enabled (eth0.1
                              appears in Luci in cerowrt). So in cero I
                              just reenabled the vlan and used a type
                              "bridge" on the network section (I renamed
                              this section se99 instead of se00). <br>
                              <br>
                              I then added se99 it to the "lan" zone of
                              the firewall. In the wireless config I
                              specified network as "se99" instead of
                              sw10 and sw00. I confirmed that the setup
                              was correct in the web interface where
                              eth0.1 sw00 and sw10 appeared under the
                              new bridged interface ( there was the nice
                              icon with the iface in brackets).<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            <div>I went on to modify the dhcp config of
                              se00 and changed se00 occurences for se99
                              and commented out entries for sw10/sw00.
                              --> this would give me dhcp running on
                              my new bridge.<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            <div>After a dnsmasq restart dnsmasq.conf
                              shows the dhcp ranges line with interface
                              se99. (I was expecting to see br-se99 but
                              maybe that file is alias aware, could be
                              wrong here).<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            <div>After a network restart I lost
                              connectivity on cable. Wireless was
                              working.<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            <div>I played a tad more and eventually lost
                              wifi as well and had to reflash the router
                              via tftp/factory image (maybe there is a
                              reset trick you could give me to avoid
                              this step).<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            <div>Are you running cerowrt in bridge mode?
                              If yes could you share your
                              network/firewall/dhcp config? Is there
                              another file I should have edited and
                              missed?<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            <div>Cheers,<br>
                              V<br>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                      <br>
                      <fieldset></fieldset>
                      <br>
                      <pre>_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank">Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel</a>
</pre>
                    </blockquote>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    <fieldset></fieldset>
                    <br>
                    <pre>_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank">Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel</a>
</pre>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Cerowrt-devel mailing list<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net">Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel"
              target="_blank">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel</a><br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>