<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">I'm using the Seeed Odyssey <a href="https://www.seeedstudio.com/ODYSSEY-X86J4105864-p-4447.html">https://www.seeedstudio.com/ODYSSEY-X86J4105864-p-4447.html</a></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div>It will shape inbound using cake (piece of cake) at 1Gbps. Dual Intel i210 controllers. I'm running stable OpenWRT, although I needed to use ToT to get a UEFI boot setup for it that would work with the internal eMMC.</div><div><br></div><div>But it has hilariously more storage and memory that I need for a border router. I _can_ completely utilize a single core with cake on inbound traffic, so I'd like to sort out multiqueue (needs a newer kernel version with a newer driver from Intel), but I haven't bothered, since it seems to handle things well, and I rarely sustain 1Gbps downloads.</div><div><br></div><div>I use the most aggressive ACK filtering setting with cake due to the 30:1 asymmetry on the link.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:54 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cerowrt-devel <<a href="mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net">cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br><br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <<a href="mailto:toke@toke.dk" target="_blank">toke@toke.dk</a>><br>To: Matt Taggart <<a href="mailto:matt@lackof.org" target="_blank">matt@lackof.org</a>>, <a href="mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank">cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>Cc: <br>Bcc: <br>Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:54:08 +0100<br>Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Looking for MORE SQM Router Recommendations !<br>Matt Taggart <<a href="mailto:matt@lackof.org" target="_blank">matt@lackof.org</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> On 3/16/21 11:30 AM, Charles Rothschild via Cerowrt-devel wrote:<br>
><br>
> > I want a 1GB capable SQM router. What options are good nowadays hw wise?<br>
><br>
> I've been using the Qotom x86 boxes and running x86 OpenWRT on them. <br>
> They have no problem doing CAKE on 1gig symmetrical connection.<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://qotom.net/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://qotom.net/</a> and then Products -> Mini PC -> Multiple NIC<br>
><br>
> But the Qotom vendor site is confusing and also doesn't list all the <br>
> products you can find available. So a while ago I made this decoder ring<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://we.riseup.net/lackof/x86-router-candidates#qotom" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://we.riseup.net/lackof/x86-router-candidates#qotom</a><br>
<br>
Nice list! One comment - the page says this:<br>
<br>
> The Intel AES-NI cpu extension can really help openssl/wireguard a lot<br>
<br>
That is true for openssl (and other TLS, even IPSec, I think), but not<br>
for wireguard - that doesn't use AES at all, but rather ChaCha20, which<br>
is not accelerated by AES-NI (and doesn't need it either).<br>
<br>
-Toke<br>
<br><br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cerowrt-devel" <<a href="mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank">cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>><br>To: Matt Taggart <<a href="mailto:matt@lackof.org" target="_blank">matt@lackof.org</a>>, <a href="mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank">cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>Cc: <br>Bcc: <br>Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 03:54:14 -0700 (PDT)<br>Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Looking for MORE SQM Router Recommendations !<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Cerowrt-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank">Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div>