[Codel] [RFC PATCH] codel: ecn mark at target
Eric Dumazet
eric.dumazet at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 23:45:38 PDT 2012
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 19:44 -0700, Dave Täht wrote:
> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at bufferbloat.net>
>
> The consensus at ietf was that ecn marking should start at
> target, and then the results fed into the codel drop scheduler.
>
> While I agree with the latter, I feel that waiting an interval
> before starting to mark will be more in-tune with the concept
> of a sojourn time, and lead to better utilization.
>
> As I am outnumbered and outgunned, do it at target.
Well, thats a huge way to favor non ECN flows against ECN flows.
Marking _all_ ECN enabled packets just because last packet sent had a
sojourn time above target is going to throttle ECN flows and let non ECN
flows going full speed and take whole bandwidth.
Doing so is a nice way to keep users switching to ECN one day.
IETF could just say : ECN is doomed, forget about it, dont even try.
More information about the Codel
mailing list