[Codel] Fwd: count and rec_inv_sqrt initialization
Kathleen Nichols
nichols at pollere.com
Fri Jul 27 16:09:40 EDT 2012
Probably best to say the control law is where we are still working.
On Jul 26, 2012, at 10:12 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 16:47 -0700, Anton Mich wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this!
>> May I also ask what is the intuition behind using this delta (which
>> is, in my understanding, equal to the number of drops between the
>> lastcount and the current count) as the new count value? I tried to
>> track down in the codel list when this changed from what's in the
>> paper, pseudocode and NS-2 to what is now in Linux but I didn't find
>> anything.
>>
>
> Kathleen & Van are still discussing of what should be exactly done here.
>
> The delta idea came from them, at a moment no public discussion was
> happening (before publication, we were privately implementing codel)
>
> Before the delta, we had following codes :
>
> Version v1 -> v6 : (05/03/2012 -> 05/05/2012)
>
> + if (now.tv64 - q->drop_next.tv64 <
> + 16 * q->interval.tv64) {
> + int c = q->count - 1;
> + q->count = c < 1 ? 1 : c;
> + } else {
> + q->count = 1;
> + }
>
> But count was growing and was not going back to lower values
>
> I suggested to use instead :
>
> if (now - drop_next< 16.*interval) {
> unsigned int c = q->count >> 1;
>
> count = c < 1 ? 1 : c;
> else {
> count = 1;
> }
>
> Then we also tried
>
> c = min(q->count - 1, q->count - (q->count>>4));
>
> (Dave even had a module param :)
>
> static u32 count_rescale(struct codel_sched_data *q, codel_time_t now) {
> s32 c = 1;
>
> if (codel_time_after(now - q->drop_next, 16 * q->interval)) {
> switch(decrease_method) {
> case 3:
> break;
> case 2: /* Dumazet 2 */
> c = q->count >> 1;
> break;
> case 1: /* Dumazet 1 */
> c = min(q->count - 1,
> q->count - (q->count >> 4));
> break;
> case 0: /* Codel Paper Default */
> default:
> c = q->count - 1;
> }
> c = max(1U, c);
> }
> return (u32) c;
> }
>
> in v13 ( 05/10/2012) we had the current form
>
> But codel is not finalized ;)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Codel mailing list
> Codel at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
More information about the Codel
mailing list