[Codel] [PATCH 1/2] codel: Controlled Delay AQM
Rick Jones
rick.jones2 at hp.com
Mon May 7 22:16:22 EDT 2012
On 05/07/2012 06:45 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
> On 05/07/2012 09:20 PM, Andrew McGregor wrote:
>> Sure... but making the Linux codel ECN capable, and even on by
>> default with no configuration, will have no effect if the clients
>> don't use ECN. So there's no need to even make it optional, let
>> alone default to off.
>>
>>
> The problem is that the client may be managing it's outbound queue with
> codel. So you have to negotiate ECN and if you start marking, you may
> run into trouble.
Are the odds really all that high that when the admin of the client set
tcp_ecn = 1 (or its non-Linux equivalent) that codel running on his
system would be the only thing actually marking and so "the" reason for
trouble? I'm inclined to agree with Andrew. If the client is going to
have trouble with ECN, it will have it once it sets tcp_ecn = 1, codel
being there or not.
rick
More information about the Codel
mailing list