[Codel] RRUL Test

Tue Apr 21 12:19:33 EDT 2015

Toke Sir,
 Thank you so much.
without your help it would never ever have been possible .
and i would have to spent many more days in installation itself only.
So thanks for everything.

Actually there is one more request.

kindly tell me something( more than something if possible) about its
results(result2.png,result3.png).

(1) what is it  showing in general?

(2) what can i interpret about these graphs related with bufferbloat.

i mean where is bufferbloat?

(3) Last is , in your articles,you have shown results with fq_codel and
codel using netperf-wrapper.
How you did that?
How can i  experiment with them(codel,fq_codel)?
what are the requirements?

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, sahil grover <sahilgrover013 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> yeah  with wired network it works:
>
> 1)  netperf-wrapper rrul netperf.bufferbloat.net
>
> Test data is in ./rrul-2015-04-21T204050.322476.json.gz (use with -i to
> format)
>
> and output is result2.png(is attached).
>
> 2)  netperf-wrapper rrul -p all_scaled -l 60 -H netperf.bufferbloat.net
>
> Graph(result3.png) is made.
> But it does not tell anything at terminal(Like in 1st case Test data is
> in....... or command never stops)
> Seems like it keeps running.
> Is it normal?
>
>
> Also wanna know about what could be issue with my wifi?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:21 PM, sahil grover <sahilgrover013 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> No,Firewall is disabled.
>>
>> tried with wired network
>>
>> 1. netperf -D -0.20 -H netperf.bufferbloat.net -t TCP_STREAM
>>
>> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to
>> atl.richb-hanover.com () port 0 AF_INET : demo
>> Interim result:    0.40 10^6bits/s over 0.324 seconds ending at
>> 1429627638.283
>> Interim result:    0.28 10^6bits/s over 0.462 seconds ending at
>> 1429627638.745
>> Interim result:    1.61 10^6bits/s over 0.244 seconds ending at
>> 1429627638.989
>> Interim result:    0.98 10^6bits/s over 0.401 seconds ending at
>> 1429627639.390
>> Interim result:    0.51 10^6bits/s over 1.034 seconds ending at
>> 1429627640.424
>> Interim result:    0.44 10^6bits/s over 1.491 seconds ending at
>> 1429627641.914
>> Interim result:    0.27 10^6bits/s over 2.418 seconds ending at
>> 1429627644.333
>> Interim result:    0.70 10^6bits/s over 1.308 seconds ending at
>> 1429627645.641
>> Interim result:    0.49 10^6bits/s over 1.334 seconds ending at
>> 1429627646.975
>> Interim result:    0.40 10^6bits/s over 0.984 seconds ending at
>> 1429627647.959
>> Recv   Send    Send
>> Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
>> Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
>> bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 174760  16384  16384    13.07       0.38
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2.  netperf -D -0.20 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net -t TCP_STREAM
>>
>>
>> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to kau.toke.dk
>> () port 0 AF_INET : demo
>> Interim result:    0.53 10^6bits/s over 0.247 seconds ending at
>> 1429627754.173
>> Interim result:    0.30 10^6bits/s over 0.437 seconds ending at
>> 1429627754.610
>> Interim result:    1.70 10^6bits/s over 0.462 seconds ending at
>> 1429627755.072
>> Interim result:    1.24 10^6bits/s over 0.424 seconds ending at
>> 1429627755.496
>> Interim result:    0.48 10^6bits/s over 1.378 seconds ending at
>> 1429627756.874
>> Interim result:    0.39 10^6bits/s over 2.686 seconds ending at
>> 1429627759.560
>> Interim result:    0.47 10^6bits/s over 2.215 seconds ending at
>> 1429627761.775
>> Interim result:    0.43 10^6bits/s over 2.151 seconds ending at
>> 1429627763.926
>> Recv   Send    Send
>> Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
>> Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
>> bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
>>
>>  87380  16384  16384    12.81       0.42
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> sahil grover <sahilgrover013 at gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > netperf -D -0.20 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net -t TCP_STREAM
>>> >
>>> > Shows:
>>> >
>>> > MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to kau.toke.dk
>>> () port 0
>>> > AF_INET : demo
>>> > Recv Send Send
>>> > Socket Socket Message Elapsed
>>> > Size Size Size Time Throughput
>>> > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>>> >
>>> > 87380 16384 16384 14.00 0.00
>>>
>>> Right, so there's definitely something messing with the outgoing
>>> traffic. I have no idea what could cause netperf to only be able to send
>>> traffic in one direction (perhaps Rick knows?). Do you have any sort of
>>> firewall between you and the internet that might interfere with traffic?
>>>
>>> -Toke
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel/attachments/20150421/cd3ef453/attachment-0002.html>