<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Hi Divya,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>is this really the only metric that you are
interested in?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>What kind of topology and traffic pattern are you
using? I would suggest to read the recent posts by Dave Taht around this topic
(perhaps looking into ns-3, as the more modern simulator, featuring RRUL test),
and also not focus too much on packet loss.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>I would think, that the average and
induced latency your RED TCP sessions are expiriencing were higher than
those governed by CoDel?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>What was the effective goodput, and the utilization
of your bottleneck link?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Qualitatively - I'd expect slightly sooner, and
sometimes (within an RTT - so not much problem for TCP CC) more losses with
Codel (depending where they happen) in order for it to get induced latency under
control. But quantitatively, the losses shouldn't be orders of magnitude more,
only so much to have a well running control loop there.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Best regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial> Richard</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=divyasingla1989@gmail.com
href="mailto:divyasingla1989@gmail.com">divya singla</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
href="mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net">codel@lists.bufferbloat.net</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, February 26, 2015 6:12
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Codel] About Packet Drop in
Codel</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>Hi Members,
<DIV>i am doing M.tech and my research topic is AQM.</DIV>
<DIV>i tried to run codel with ns-2.35.</DIV>
<DIV>And i found packet loss is more in codel as compared to RED.</DIV>
<DIV>is there anybody who also thinks the same or is it in my case only?</DIV>
<DIV>Am i doing something wrong?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>Codel mailing
list<BR><A
href="mailto:Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net">Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net</A><BR><A
href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>