[Ecn-sane] is FQ actually widely deployed?

Pete Heist pete at heistp.net
Mon Jul 22 14:02:00 EDT 2019


> On Jul 22, 2019, at 1:05 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> wrote:
> 
> Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>> On 22 Jul, 2019, at 10:14 am, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Do we have numbers on how much FQ is actually out there? If we don't,
>>> can we measure it? Anyone know of devices shipping or being designed
>>> that does FQ of some kind?
>> 
>> There's also a large French ISP which has done fq_codel on its last
>> mile for quite some time.
> 
> I am aware of at least two Danish and one Norwegian ISP that have
> deployed FQ-CoDel-based shapers either as their customer shapers in the
> backend or on CPEs.

In Czech, I’m aware at least of two WISPs that use it. It’s a good bet there
are more, as a company has popped up specifically targeting WISPs which
uses passive monitoring and fq_codel to measure and improve customer
qoe. It doesn’t take too much searching to find them.


More information about the Ecn-sane mailing list