[Ecn-sane] Fwd: [PATCH net] ipv4: Ignore ECN bits for fib lookups in fib_compute_spec_dst()
Rodney W. Grimes
4bone at gndrsh.dnsmgr.net
Tue Dec 29 08:33:58 EST 2020
Dave,
Thanks for the heads up on this...
Comments in line about what, IMHO, is very bad practice.
Regards,
Rod
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Guillaume Nault <gnault at redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:05 AM
> Subject: [PATCH net] ipv4: Ignore ECN bits for fib lookups in
> fib_compute_spec_dst()
> To: David Miller <davem at davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org>
> Cc: <netdev at vger.kernel.org>
>
>
> RT_TOS() only clears one of the ECN bits. Therefore, when
> fib_compute_spec_dst() resorts to a fib lookup, it can return
> different results depending on the value of the second ECN bit.
>
> For example, ECT(0) and ECT(1) packets could be treated differently.
>
> $ ip netns add ns0
> $ ip netns add ns1
> $ ip link add name veth01 netns ns0 type veth peer name veth10 netns ns1
> $ ip -netns ns0 link set dev lo up
> $ ip -netns ns1 link set dev lo up
> $ ip -netns ns0 link set dev veth01 up
> $ ip -netns ns1 link set dev veth10 up
>
> $ ip -netns ns0 address add 192.0.2.10/24 dev veth01
> $ ip -netns ns1 address add 192.0.2.11/24 dev veth10
>
> $ ip -netns ns1 address add 192.0.2.21/32 dev lo
> $ ip -netns ns1 route add 192.0.2.10/32 tos 4 dev veth10 src 192.0.2.21
> $ ip netns exec ns1 sysctl -wq net.ipv4.icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts=0
>
> With TOS 4 and ECT(1), ns1 replies using source address 192.0.2.21
> (ping uses -Q to set all TOS and ECN bits):
>
> $ ip netns exec ns0 ping -c 1 -b -Q 5 192.0.2.255
> [...]
> 64 bytes from 192.0.2.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.544 ms
>
> But with TOS 4 and ECT(0), ns1 replies using source address 192.0.2.11
> because the "tos 4" route isn't matched:
>
> $ ip netns exec ns0 ping -c 1 -b -Q 6 192.0.2.255
> [...]
> 64 bytes from 192.0.2.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.597 ms
>
> After this patch the ECN bits don't affect the result anymore:
>
> $ ip netns exec ns0 ping -c 1 -b -Q 6 192.0.2.255
> [...]
> 64 bytes from 192.0.2.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.591 ms
>
> Fixes: 35ebf65e851c ("ipv4: Create and use fib_compute_spec_dst() helper.")
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault at redhat.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> index cdf6ec5aa45d..84bb707bd88d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ __be32 fib_compute_spec_dst(struct sk_buff *skb)
> .flowi4_iif = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX,
> .flowi4_oif = l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(dev),
> .daddr = ip_hdr(skb)->saddr,
> - .flowi4_tos = RT_TOS(ip_hdr(skb)->tos),
> + .flowi4_tos = ip_hdr(skb)->tos & IPTOS_RT_MASK,
This is, IMHO, a bad way to fix this. It addresses the issue
by NOT using what should be the standard method of accessing
tos bits. And further if RT_TOS is every properly fixed leaves
a dangling place that would need to be cleaned up later.
I understand that RT_TOS is legacy and returns the whole byte,
that should probably be corrected as I suspect there are other
lurking cases of use of RT_TOS that is also still consuming
the ECN bits.
The above one line patch is the "fast and dirty" way to
do it, and leads to longer term maintainance issues.
I assert this Opinion from my experience in trying
to clean up IN_ADDR macros in the BSD's, 90% of what
needing patching was caused mostly by special cases
that didnt use the macros, and instead did there own
bit banging with | and &.
A better fix might be to create some new macros, make the
old macro emmit a compile time warning to weed out the
bad use cases:
a) Modify RT_TOS to assert a compile time warning to
flag old usage.
b) create RT_TOSBYTE, this returns the whole byte, used
to replace RT_TOS when the whole byte is needed and
dealt with properly.
c) create RT_TOSTOSBITS, this returns ONLY the TOS bits,
and probably should replace most of the current calls
to RT_TOS with this, after inspecting the code to
make sure it does the right thing.
d) create RT_TOSECNBITS, this returns ONLY the ECN bits
> .flowi4_scope = scope,
> .flowi4_mark = vmark ? skb->mark : 0,
> };
> --
> 2.21.3
>
>
>
> --
> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
>
> dave at taht.net <Dave T?ht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> _______________________________________________
> Ecn-sane mailing list
> Ecn-sane at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane
>
>
--
Rod Grimes rgrimes at freebsd.org
More information about the Ecn-sane
mailing list