[LibreQoS] DPDK vs XDP

[Herbert Wolverson]

Sorry I had to run - daycare schedule is tight if I want to park anywhere
remotely nearby.

I glanced through, and raising the hashmap/trie sizes is pretty
straightforward. The bigger problem looks to be the class numbering scheme
(major:minor). I wonder if it's possible to change the representation to
use 8 bits for Major/CPU and 24 for the minor? That would give us 16
million identifiers.

I'll try to research tomorrow.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, 5:48 PM Robert Chacón via LibreQoS <
libreqos at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> If we can get the IP filtering limit upped from 32k and introduce virtual
> interfaces to split up HTBs as Toke suggested, we could see some crazy
> throughput thanks to XDP. Very exciting!
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:41 PM Dave Taht via LibreQoS <
> libreqos at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>> I still get the giggles when I see the CPU usage on fig 4.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-paper/blob/master/xdp-the-express-data-path.pdf
>>
>> DPDK is a great way to heat data centers.
>>
>> --
>> This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
>>
>> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
>> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>> _______________________________________________
>> LibreQoS mailing list
>> LibreQoS at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos
>>
>
>
> --
> Robert Chacón
> CEO | JackRabbit Wireless LLC <http://jackrabbitwireless.com>
> _______________________________________________
> LibreQoS mailing list
> LibreQoS at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/libreqos/attachments/20221013/05d2382c/attachment.html>