[Make-wifi-fast] more well funded attempts showing market demand for better wifi

Thu Jun 23 17:41:19 EDT 2016

Curious, where does the "in a LAN setup, the variability in [receive]
signal strength is likely small enough" assertion come?   Any specific
power numbers here? We test with many combinations of "signal strength
variability" (e.g. deltas range from 0 dBm -  50 dBm) and per different
channel conditions.  This includes power variability within the spatial
streams' MiMO transmission.   It would be helpful to have some physics
combined with engineering to produce some pragmatic limits to this.

Also, mobile devices have a goal of reducing power in order to be efficient
with their battery (vs a goal to balance power such that an AP can
receive simultaneously.)  Power per bit usually trumps most other design
goals.  There market for battery powered wi-fi devices drives a
semi-conductor mfg's revenue so my information come with that bias.

Bob

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:48 PM, <dpreed at reed.com> wrote:

> The actual issues of transmitting on multiple channels at the same time
> are quite minor if you do the work in the digital domain (pre-DAC).  You
> just need a higher sampling rate in the DAC and add the two signals
> together (and use a wideband filter that covers all the channels).  No RF
> problem.
>
> Receiving multiple transmissions in different channels is pretty much the
> same problem - just digitize (ADC) a wider bandwidth and separate in the
> digital domain.  the only real issue on receive is equalization - if you
> receive two different signals at different receive signal strengths, the
> lower strength signal won't get as much dynamic range in its samples.
>
> But in a LAN setup, the variability in signal strength is likely small
> enough that you can cover that with more ADC bits (or have the MAC protocol
> manage the station transmit power so that signals received at the AP are
> nearly the same power.
>
> Equalization at transmit works very well when there is a central AP (as in
> cellular or normal WiFi systems).
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 23, 2016 4:28pm, "Bob McMahon" <bob.mcmahon at broadcom.com>
> said:
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> > Make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
> > An AP per room/area, reducing the tx power (beacon range) has been my
> > approach and has scaled very well.   It does require some wires to each
> AP
> > but I find that paying an electrician to run some quality wiring to
> things
> > that are to remain stationary has been well worth the cost.
> >
> > just my $0.02,
> > Bob
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:10 PM, David Lang <david at lang.hm> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, just using the 5GHz DFS channels in 80MHz or 160 MHz wide chunks
> >> would be a huge improvement, not many people are using them (yet), and
> the
> >> wide channels let you get a lot of data out at once. If everything is
> >> within a good range of the AP, this would work pretty well. If you end
> up
> >> needing multiple APs, or you have many stations, I expect that you will
> be
> >> better off with more APs at lower power, each using different channels.
> >>
> >> David Lang
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Bob McMahon wrote:
> >>
> >> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:55:19 -0700
> >>> From: Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon at broadcom.com>
> >>> To: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net,
> >>>     "cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net"
> >>>     <cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> >>> Subject: Re: [Make-wifi-fast] more well funded attempts showing market
> >>> demand
> >>>     for better wifi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> hmm, I'm skeptical.   To use multiple carriers simultaneously is
> difficult
> >>> per RF issues.   Even if that is somehow resolved, to increase
> throughput
> >>> usually requires some form of channel bonding, i.e. needed on both
> sides,
> >>> and brings in issues with preserving frame ordering.  If this is just
> >>> channel hopping, that needs coordination between both sides (and isn't
> >>> simultaneous, possibly costing more than any potential gain.)   An AP
> only
> >>> solution can use channel switch announcements (CSA) but there is a
> cost to
> >>> those as well.
> >>>
> >>> I guess don't see any break though here and the marketing on the site
> >>> seems
> >>> to indicate something beyond physics, at least the physics that I
> >>> understand.  Always willing to learn and be corrected if I'm
> >>> misunderstanding things.
> >>>
> >>> Bob
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/portalwifi/portal-turbocharged-wifi?ref=backerkit
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Portal is the first and only router specifically engineered to cut
> >>>>> through and avoid congestion, delivering consistent, high-performance
> >>>>> WiFi with greater coverage throughout your home.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Its proprietary spectrum turbocharger technology provides access to
> >>>>> 300% more of the radio airwaves than any other router, improving
> >>>>> performance by as much as 300x, and range and coverage by as much as
> >>>>> 2x in crowded settings, such as city homes and multi-unit apartments"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It sounds like they are promising working DFS support.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It's not clear what chipset they are using (they are claiming wave2) -
> >>>> but they are at least publicly claiming to be using openwrt. So I
> >>>> threw in enough to order one for september, just so I could comment on
> >>>> their kickstarter page. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd have loved to have got in earlier (early shipments are this month
> >>>> apparently), but those were sold out.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/portalwifi/portal-turbocharged-wifi/comments
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Dave Täht
> >>>>> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
> >>>>> http://blog.cerowrt.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Dave Täht
> >>>> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
> >>>> http://blog.cerowrt.org
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> >>>> Make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net
> >>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> >> Make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/make-wifi-fast/attachments/20160623/222b06dc/attachment-0001.html>