[Make-wifi-fast] iperf3 udp flood behavior at higher rates

[Dave Taht]

to fork the fq_codel_drop discussion a bit...

I have up and running two new boxes[1] that are my hope to be able to
test ath10k/ath9k hardware with, for this test, using one in the
middle as a router and a nuc i3 box as the server, all ports pure
ethernet... there's a switch in the way, too.

On tcp via netperf I get expected ~940 mbits.

On udp via iperf3 (again, all pure ethernet) -  in neither case below
am I seeing any drops in the qdisc itself anywhere on the path, yet am
only achieving 500mbit.

?

1) Using the

iperf3 -c 172.26.16.130 -u -b900M -R -l1472 -t600

udp flood version, I get some loss on the initial burst, but none
*reported* after that, and peak at about ~500Mbits.

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth       Jitter
Lost/Total Datagrams
[  4]   0.00-1.00   sec  52.1 MBytes   437 Mbits/sec  0.037 ms
1276/38379 (3.3%)
[  4]   1.00-2.00   sec  54.3 MBytes   456 Mbits/sec  0.042 ms  0/38699 (0%)
[  4]   2.00-3.00   sec  56.1 MBytes   470 Mbits/sec  0.030 ms  0/39933 (0%)

2) Flipping the sense of the test by getting rid of -R (from the nuc)

iperf3 -c 172.26.16.130 -u -b900M -l1472 -t600

I get on the other side a steady state throughput of a little over
520mbits (with 41% loss reported consistently)

[  5]  37.00-38.00  sec  64.2 MBytes   539 Mbits/sec  0.026 ms
31613/77355 (41%)
[  5]  38.00-39.00  sec  62.8 MBytes   527 Mbits/sec  0.023 ms
31517/76255 (41%)
[  5]  39.00-40.00  sec  62.0 MBytes   520 Mbits/sec  0.033 ms
31052/75201 (41%)

On the other:

[  4]  77.00-78.00  sec   111 MBytes   929 Mbits/sec  78915
[  4]  78.00-79.00  sec   103 MBytes   864 Mbits/sec  73371
[  4]  79.00-80.00  sec   108 MBytes   907 Mbits/sec  77034
[  4]  80.00-81.00  sec   107 MBytes   900 Mbits/sec  76423
[  4]  81.00-82.00  sec   104 MBytes   875 Mbits/sec  74277
[  4]  82.00-83.00  sec   113 MBytes   950 Mbits/sec  80666


Thinking that perhaps I was seeing loss in the rx ring, I used ethtool
to increase that from the default 256 to 4096...

only to hang things thoroughly... :( and I'm watching things reboot now.

Netperf does not have a multi-hop capable udp flood test (rick jones
can explain why... )

As I recall on this thread iperf3 was being run on a mac box as a
client, and I'll dig one up - but was it also osx on the other side of
the test?

And what other params would I tweak on linux to see a udp flood go faster?

Topology looks like this:

apu1 <-> apu2 <-> switch <-> nuc.

I could put another switch in the way, I am always nervous about
invoking hw flow control...

[1] http://www.pcengines.ch/apu2c4.htm