[Make-wifi-fast] less latency, more filling... for wifi
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
brouer at redhat.com
Wed Oct 11 17:30:56 EDT 2017
Hi Bob,
Just wanted to let you know, that after you posted this, I've started
to use your iperf2 tool again. To verify some of my kernel code.
I particularly liked that I can send with a specific PPS rate, like:
iperf2-git -c 172.16.0.2 -e -u -b 20000pps -i 1
On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 14:04:35 -0700 Bob McMahon <bob.mcmahon at broadcom.com> wrote:
> Not sure if this is helpful but we've added end/end latency measurements
> for UDP traffic in iperf 2.0.10 <https://sourceforge.net/projects/iperf2/>.
I tried it out, but the clock between my two machines are not accurate
enough (as you hint below).
> It does require the clocks to be synched. I use a spectracom tsync pcie
> card with either an oven controlled oscillator or a GPS disciplined one,
> then use precision time protocol to distribute the clock over ip
> multicast.
> For Linux, the traffic threads are set to realtime scheduling
> to minimize latency adds per thread scheduling..
If I use the --realtime option, I did run into issues where the server
thread would busypoll 100% after e.g. a client stopped a test prematurely.
And I had to kill it with -9.
Thanks for you work!
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
More information about the Make-wifi-fast
mailing list